The following words are for reference only because they are personal opinions. Do not be too trusting and disappointed.
First, the film is too long and lacking in attraction. The movie repeatedly countless scenes showing AOE's devastatingly unnecessary skills. Is it necessary to kill the police and civilians in the film when the audience is clear about the killer of the protagonist? The film does not exaggerate the power of the male lead but only reduce the value of the film. The audience will again say "Death again!" After seeing the male power burst. The director wants to highlight the pain and torment of the male lead? But many times he shows it and does not need it any more. The evidence is that he locked himself in the shed and wrapped his arms around the house to prevent others from committing suicide, chasing people away from the elevator while away from his relatives, and he also said, "I am a bomb. slow "... All that shows how painful and tormenting you are if you kill someone.
Second, the character of the husband is too redundant and also messes up the film as well as create more trouble for the couple's circumstances. The author would like to introduce his sister through this character? This is entirely possible in the female lead segment recalls the leaflets find people, unfortunately only remember the face. Throughout the movie, the husband is only jealous and destructive (police report because he thinks his wife is not feeling anything for himself and then lost, then regretted that the female lead just forgotten, not necessarily want to lose himself) . It does not work when after a scene the husband disappears and does not contribute to the film. I am still very vague about this character, could the author put him in the way to highlight the sentimental female lead for the male lead? If that is not so. The audience can feel the emotions of the female lead for the male lead. Run hugging the male lead after meeting in the elevator without blaming a sentence (do not need to fly into the hug without such affection), put your hands on the male lead when sleeping (this action only appears when we trust and feel safe and have sympathy. What role does the husband really have in the film?
At first, its power and appearance are too sketchy. Actually, how does this power kill people? In the movie a specialist said that the capacity to evaporate the victim's brain, but only the guesswork and the viewer is forever vague about it while this is what makes the two main characters come closer together. The movie also does not explain why a harmonized sound does not harm. Only one energy can be struck between the two, and both can have the same kill power. Why is there a difference? The movie should spend more time explaining this than adding the hooligan husband character to the movie. The emergence of light rays was recorded but the whole world of experts or scientists still did not come to the scene. A strange phenomenon and broadcast on television can completely grasp the cause of many deaths occurring in the place where it hits down, which is completely forgotten and is only deeply rooted in the virus-air cause. . The director should focus on creating more power and not putting it into the movie and then through the speakers.
Second, the ending is too short (out of funds?). Apparently the heroine could not finish the male lead because she had begun to have feelings for him, so the female lead decided to do the male lead. For the movie to end like that makes the movie meaningless, then what does the film say? If the female lead to choose the film may want to say a specific message to the audience, this is not. It is absurd to have such an end. It could be a more meaningful ending, for example, the male lead does not help the female lead and leaves, the real intentional title is Radius who surrounds the male lead, including the female lead.
Read more:
First, the film is too long and lacking in attraction. The movie repeatedly countless scenes showing AOE's devastatingly unnecessary skills. Is it necessary to kill the police and civilians in the film when the audience is clear about the killer of the protagonist? The film does not exaggerate the power of the male lead but only reduce the value of the film. The audience will again say "Death again!" After seeing the male power burst. The director wants to highlight the pain and torment of the male lead? But many times he shows it and does not need it any more. The evidence is that he locked himself in the shed and wrapped his arms around the house to prevent others from committing suicide, chasing people away from the elevator while away from his relatives, and he also said, "I am a bomb. slow "... All that shows how painful and tormenting you are if you kill someone.
Second, the character of the husband is too redundant and also messes up the film as well as create more trouble for the couple's circumstances. The author would like to introduce his sister through this character? This is entirely possible in the female lead segment recalls the leaflets find people, unfortunately only remember the face. Throughout the movie, the husband is only jealous and destructive (police report because he thinks his wife is not feeling anything for himself and then lost, then regretted that the female lead just forgotten, not necessarily want to lose himself) . It does not work when after a scene the husband disappears and does not contribute to the film. I am still very vague about this character, could the author put him in the way to highlight the sentimental female lead for the male lead? If that is not so. The audience can feel the emotions of the female lead for the male lead. Run hugging the male lead after meeting in the elevator without blaming a sentence (do not need to fly into the hug without such affection), put your hands on the male lead when sleeping (this action only appears when we trust and feel safe and have sympathy. What role does the husband really have in the film?
Second, the ending is too short (out of funds?). Apparently the heroine could not finish the male lead because she had begun to have feelings for him, so the female lead decided to do the male lead. For the movie to end like that makes the movie meaningless, then what does the film say? If the female lead to choose the film may want to say a specific message to the audience, this is not. It is absurd to have such an end. It could be a more meaningful ending, for example, the male lead does not help the female lead and leaves, the real intentional title is Radius who surrounds the male lead, including the female lead.
Read more:
Nhận xét
Đăng nhận xét